Food Hall Design Theory

Conceptually, the idea of a food hall isn’t entirely new. Collections of local, varied food and beverage vendors in a dedicated retail space have been around for centuries, both globally and nationally. The impulse to concentrate commercial activity is an old one. It allows for a more controlled urban environment and the easier access to products. The Romans tried it – the market of Trajan survives, its brick structure and concrete vaults forming a curved shopping arcade. The modern food hall can trace its roots back thousands of years but when did the market hall become an arcade or mall, a place with permanent shops, bars and restaurants? There was no simple historical evolution from one to the other. 

Those that have persisted are often in urban centers, and, in North America, include spots like the Pike Place Market in Seattle, established in 1907, Reading Terminal Market, in Philadelphia since 1893, and Boston’s Quincy Market, which dates back to 1742.

The ubiquitous food courts contained within shopping malls, airports, train stations, and department stores are undoubtedly familiar, too, and have been around for decades. But food halls in the most current sense are something inherently different. The definition of what defines a food hall is still being debated, but it’s generally accepted that ‘food culture’ including the farm-to-fork and slow food movements is largely responsible for kick starting the modern food hall concept as is at the resurgence of experiential retailing.

And it’s likely the internet has played a role in shaping food halls, too. As e-commerce continues to change traditional brick-and-mortar models, accounting for an increasing percentage of retail spending with each passing year, retailers have been forced to keep up with the times. Shopping malls are fewer and further between now than only years before, and the traditional food court concept that once provided a chance for a shopping break has changed, too.

Programmatically, specific design choices are geared towards differentiating food halls from other places to dine out, with a mix of characteristics seeming to apply in whole or in part to each. Food halls regularly offer highly curated and visually appealing experiences that showcase local businesses and, in some cases, have a greater goal of urban development.

These modern food halls offer all day dining and house multipurpose communal spaces. Baltimore’s R. House, for example, proudly markets itself as a space meant for more than just eating: “This is your living room, your kitchen, your office, your hangout spot, your Baltimore stoop, your happy place.”

Design

The built environment housing a food hall is often as much of a draw as the food and drink on offer. Fareground, in Austin, Texas, was designed with a distinctive, wood-laden space. The Bourse in Philadelphia, opened recently in a historic landmarked Beaux Arts building that formerly housed the states’ first commodities exchange market. Aster Hall which opened in Chicago creates 16 stations offering things from street tacos to sushi to cocktails in what they call “food vaults”, because of their unique recessed architecture. It’s surely no coincidence that these design-minded halls photograph as well as their food does, an especially important consideration when aiming to appeal to younger generations of customers.

Location

In other cases, food halls’ physical environs are significant not only in isolation, but within a larger context. Mixed use developments that incorporate food halls can be appealing to real estate developers and tenants alike, allowing landlords to ask for more per square foot from tenants who view a conveniently located collection of quality dining options within the same building as an amenity. As such, food halls are increasingly appearing in newly constructed high-rise office and apartment buildings.

Further still, food halls have the potential to shape the neighborhoods around them. New Orlean’s Pythian Hall, for example, now occupies the first floor of a historically significant nine-story building originally constructed in 1908 for a fraternal organization. It sat vacant for years after hurricane Katrina, but the new food hall has spurred revitalization efforts. This food hall is an early step in realizing a larger vision for the surrounding downtown neighborhood’s resurrection.

Current Planning Trends

While some food halls serve as second locations for existing, established spots others are looking to provide space for new businesses.

Tastemakers which opened this past April in D.C.’s Brookland neighborhood, is doing both. It’s an incubator and food hall in one; the commercial kitchen space currently helps to meet the production needs of 15 businesses (with room for more), while the food hall houses eight vendors, a bar, and a grab-and-go grocery section. Of the food hall’s current tenants, two businesses have locations elsewhere, while the rest are vending for the first time. Participants’ contracts are initially for six months, so there’s plenty of changeover potential which creates varied offerings and a constantly evolving market.

Detroit’s newest food hall, the Fort Street Galley, also took a unique approach, modeling its selection process and business strategies after tech incubators. Opened in the city’s historical Federal Reserve Building, it currently features four businesses who participated in a competitive application process in which experienced chefs and aspiring restaurateurs alike applied, and finalists pitched their concepts to local judges. At the end of their first year at the Galley, restaurants can choose to extend their lease, move on to their own space, or nix their business altogether.

From a consumer standpoint, models like these certainly help to keep things interesting, ensuring that food halls, on both an individual and collective level, are continually evolving.

Typology

Past and Current

The impulse to concentrate commercial activity is an old one. It allows for a more controlled urban environment and the easier access to products. The Romans tried it – the market of Trajan survives, its brick structure and concrete vaults forming a curved shopping arcade. The modern food hall can trace its roots back thousands of years but when did the market hall become an arcade or mall, a place with permanent shops? There was no simple historical evolution from one to the other.

A certain ambiguity surrounds certain grand shopping structures of the late Middle Ages, such as the Palazze della Ragione of Italian cities like Padua and Bergamo. These have vaulted undercrofts populated by shops in the former case and occasional stalls in the latter, and both overlook squares with regular markets. These buildings, the name of which means ‘palace of reason’, were multi-purpose affairs, with council chambers and law courts occupying the upper stories. As such they are a kind of built metaphor for the argument that modern rationality sprouts from commercial foundations.

More provincial market halls of the late medieval period, of which a few survive, as at Châtillon-sur-Chalaronne in Ain, are purer examples of the type, mere roofs supported on spindly legs. Indeed, the ideal market hall is all roof, and as such it is a Modernist antecedent in the sense that it floats almost on columns, allowing light and fresh air to penetrate the space below.

Splendid though these complex timber constructions are, they can’t hold a candle to the great souks of the early modern Islamic world, among them Al-Madina in Aleppo, Khan el-Khalili in Cairo, and the Grand Bazaar in Istanbul. The last of these was begun in 1455, and, with its more than 4,000 shops, is perhaps the largest covered market in the world. The enclosure of the market with masonry vaults was a means of securing the goods that were left behind while the complex was closed at night. In plan, the Grand Bazaar resembles a city district, with 61 covered streets and a number of squares of varying sizes. The effect of the irregular layout is quite disorienting to the uninitiated, but there is a stringent zoning logic at work: as well as collecting retail in one place, the vendors were grouped according to their merchandise, with streets devoted to leather, jewelry, textiles, and so on.

The Grand Bazaar in Istanbul, constructed between 1455 and 1600

This rationalization was taken further in later centuries. In Versailles, a covered market of four forms the perimeter of an open-air market square. As a piece of urban planning, it evinces an impressively logical design concept thoroughly executed, something that could best be achieved under the absolute rule of its patron, Louis XIII. In the 19th century, the new materials of the Industrial Revolution, together with changing understandings of public health and changing expectations of urban cleanliness, created great new central markets, of which Les Halles in Paris was the undisputed king. In these marvelously vast and lightweight structures, trades could be gathered.

The two giants of 19th-century market design were Victor Baltard in Paris and Horace Jones in London. Baltard, city architect from 1849, was the creator of Les Halles, the 12 elegant pavilions of which were linked by covered walkways to form an iron metropolis of food – or, as Hugo put it, the belly of Paris. Baltard had previously worked on the Abattoirs de la Villette with Jules de Mérindol (the impressively spare Halle aux Boeufs has since been refunctioned as an events venue within Parc de la Villette), Marché Secrétan (now a supermarket) and the Marché de La Chappelle, the only one that still functions as intended. Les Halles is of course long gone, swept away by Pompidou in 1971 and replaced by an unpleasant subterranean mall, itself since removed.

19th-century engraving showing the interior of Les Halles

Horace Jones, working a little later in London, produced Leadenhall Market, old Billingsgate, and Smithfield. In contrast to the spare neoclassicism of Baltard, we are now in the florid heyday of Victorian historicism – Jones’s final, posthumously completed work was Tower Bridge – and the ironwork structure of his buildings is flamboyantly decorated. Beyond the capital, great iron-roofed markets were built all over Britain, including Leeds in 1857 and Stockport in 1860 – again, two polar examples of encrustation and restraint, partly motivated in this instance by differing municipal budgets.

Perhaps the most enjoyable markets in the world are to be found in Spain, among them numerous exemplary iron-framed buildings. Mercado Colon and Mercado Central in Valencia are extraordinary cathedrals dedicated to epicurean pleasure; Lonja del Barranco in Seville is smaller but exquisitely detailed; likewise the famous San Miguel market in Madrid. These, and the British and French examples mentioned above, exemplify a gamut of approaches to planning, from the covered streets of Leadenhall, via the ecclesiastical nave and aisles of Mercado Colon, to the modular agglomeration of steel shed-like units in Stockport. The versatility of the new material permitted permit even wider spans and more fantastic spatial effects.

Mercado Central, Valencia, built 1914-28 by Enrique Vial

The pioneers of concrete took a variety of approaches to their new material. A very early example (1909) is to be found in Wroclaw, a center of architectural innovation at the turn of the century when the city was called Breslau. Hidden behind a historicist facade of uncertain derivation, the parabolic arches of the market form a soaring concrete nave. There were to be some further historicist excursions before the golden age of concrete arrived – among them the attractive concrete Romanesque of Stuttgart, and the bizarre Neoclassical battleship of Ribera market in Bilbao. Then, beginning in the late 1920s, there was an explosion of new forms: les Halles du Boulingrin in Reims by Émile Maigrot and engineer Eugène Freyssinet has a fantastic parabolic vault only 70mm thick, while in Bologna, the old Mercato Ortofrutticolo has a typically virtuosic roof by Pier Luigi Nervi.

These innovations soon spread, depositing offspring in Trieste’s big shed of a market with its quasi-Constructivist spiral corner, Smithfield’s stunning saucer-domed poultry market, and the pendulously bulging roof of Zhitny market, Kiev. Most striking of all is the covered market in Royan, completed in 1955 to the designs of Louis Simon, André Morisseau, and engineer René Sarger. It marks the culmination of a ceremonial route stretching down to the beach, a clam shell-shaped temple to food.

1955

While material innovations were transforming the type, the onslaught of the automobile led to the exile of the great central wholesale markets. Les Halles was demolished in 1971 and the market relocated to the suburb of Rungis, Covent Garden was sent to south-west London in 1974, Billingsgate to Docklands in 1982, and Spitalfields to east London in 1991. The huge Abasto Market in Buenos Aires was relocated to a hangar near the airport in 1984, but happily the exuberant Art Deco structure remains, now occupied by a mall, and, in its vaulted upper story, a somewhat surreal funfair. These translations all coincided with the rise of a non-productive industry and its white-collar workers. None of the replacement markets are in any way remarkable.

The food hall shelters an abundance of delights and lots of signs, aromas and sights. The architecture of the food hall or market is the stage for this enthralling drama. In some cases, however, the backdrop upstages the culinary stars.

There have been some notable recent additions to the food hall building type, among them MVRDV’s tunnel of love in Rotterdam.

The vault of MVRDV's market hall in Rotterdam is spectacular

The Modernist motif of the floating roof, whether cantilevered or supported on impossibly spindly legs, found its ideal functions in the factory and the market. Historiographic prejudice has tended to favor the architecture of production, but the heroic pioneers of iron and concrete also crowned vendors of fruit and vegetables with stunning spans. This tradition was given a Postmodern flavor: the rainbow-tiled roof rests gently on the extant historic fabric rather than sweeping it away in favor of structural clarity. This idea was returned in the recent redevelopment of a market in Talinn. Established after the break-up of the USSR, when the black market came out of the shadows all over the former bloc, the old warehouse buildings have now been given a new zigzag timber roof resting on iron trees. This structure is drawn out into the square to shelter temporary stalls.









arch-logo
vldg
JDB

TarLan Design Build

Architectura and VLDG

A passion for architecture. The vision to create exceptional and timeless design. The ability to craft innovative solutions to complex problems. Flawless project execution and management by an experienced staff. Successful architecture is not only about design. It's not just about beautiful drawings. The real success of architecture in practice is the seamless integration of project goals, innovative design and a commanding understanding of business.

Team members possess significant experience in hospitality and residential design. Architectura Principal and Founder, Conrad Roncati, has designed multiple urban hotels and thousands of residential apartments. VLDG principal Paul Vega was responsible for the evolution and development of the Design Aesthetic, Direction and Narrative Positioning as Vice President of Design for W Hotels Worldwide during an unprecedented period of growth for a Lifestyle Luxury Brand in cities such as Santiago, Chile, Barcelona, Koh Samui, Thailand, Bali, Dubai, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Milan and St Petersburg to name just a few of the 30 W Hotels designed and currently being constructed globally. Additionally, collaboration in the Concepting for the Creation of “Culinary Concepts”, the innovative Food & Beverage collaboration between Starwood Hotels and internationally renowned chef, Jean-Georges. VLDG principal Vennie Lau was responsible for Sourcing and Design Development for Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide for Sheraton & Four Points properties.

VLDG's current collaborators and accolades include:

Designing for a celebrity & the strategic global expansion of a European Hotel Company.

Pestana Hotel Group joint ventured with soccer super star, Cristiano Ronaldo to create a lifestyle hotel brand, Pestana CR7.

The vldg concepted & designed hotel, the 4th property and first outside of the EU is scheduled to open in New York City Q3 2020.

Co- creators for a new Lifestyle Hotel Brand:

VLDG was selected by Hyatt Hotels to develop and create the design language and principles for a new lifestyle hotel brand Front of House and innovative Retail Food Market and Restaurant concepts for HYATT Centric.

HYATT Centric’s portfolio is growing strong and spreading across the globe, including the vldg designed property in Silicon Valley & the first NYC hotel scheduled to accept guests Q2 2020

Recent Accolades:

Hospitality Design - Hyatt Herald Sq, NY. BOUTIQUE/LIFESTYLE PUBLIC SPACES – WINNER

Wallpaper – Memorable Hotel Openings 2015 - HYATT Herald Sq, NY

GOLD KEY AWARD EXCELLENCE IN HOSPITALITY DESIGN – Hyatt Union Sq, NY. BEST LOBBY - LUXURY

Fodor’s Top 100 Hotel Awards – Hyatt Union Sq – “Sleekest City Hotels”

Conde Nast Travelers HOT LIST – Duane Street Boutique Hotel, NYC, NY.

Click here for the Full Qualifications PDF PDF

TarLan Design Build

TarLan Design Principals Saverio Tarantino & Richard Lanciers, Jr have designed and managed New Mixed Use Developments, Restaurant renovations and build outs, Ground up Hotels and Residential Apartment Buildings throughout their careers in the fast paced market of NYC. We have provided consulting services for a broad range of companies, facilities and projects. Client satisfaction has always been their top priority.

Click here for the Full Qualifications PDF PDF

Jacob | Doland | Beer

Jacobs | Doland | Beer is a New York City based foodservice design firm specializing in the planning and construction of commercial foodservice and hospitality venues.

The planning of projects involving commercial foodservice facilities has become increasingly complex. Energy conservation, efficient labor utilization and cost effectiveness are just a few of the areas the planner must be concerned with.

We are uniquely qualified by years of actual experience in planning and overseeing the construction of innumerable foodservice facilities to assist with the planning of this project. Among the services we offer are programming, space allocation, arrangement of kitchen equipment and dining areas, selection and specification of equipment and assistance with the securing of the competitive bids. Many additional planning and management services are available.

J|D|B is an independent management and planning consulting firm. We are not in any way associated with the manufacture, sale, or promotion of any product or system. Our only interest is to provide each client with the highest level of professional planning available.

We believe that a consulting firm can only be as effective as the personnel they employee. Therefore, every project regardless of size receives the personal attention of our Project Director who then assigns specific consulting tasks to associates. Total project responsibility always remains with the Project Director who maintains personal contact with each project and oversees its progress. Our approach to planning has always been and continues to be close interaction with the architects, engineers, and other project team members. We communicate often and well, and strive to avoid problems by questioning, analyzing and advising wherever our input can be of value.

Click here for the Full Qualifications PDF PDF

Great Northern Food Hall

Grand Central, New York, NY

Gotham Market at the Ashland

Brooklyn,NY

Gotham West Market

New York, NY

Pennsy

New York, NY

Urbanspace - Vanderbilt Market

New York, NY

One Park

Cliffside Park, New Jersey

Bell Works

Holmdel, New Jersey

Red Bull Corporate Office

Bell Plaza

Jersey City, New Jersey

Hudson Lights

Fort Lee, New Jersey

King Waterpark

Palisades Park, New Jersey

41st Mixed-Use

New York, New York

W Hotel

Guangzhou

W Hotel

Hong Kong

W Hotel

Barcelona

Hyatt Herald Square

New York City

Bazar Tapas Bar & Restaurant

Blvd. Bistro & Bar

Filoncino

Heavy Woods Bar & Restaurant

Rookery

Starbucks Queens Blvd









Introduction

We strive in all of our projects to create modern and evocative hospitality places that are grounded in time and history. It is important in the building planning and design to ensure that this new food hall maintains its connection to the past by responding to its neighborhood extant buildings while supporting the needs of the patrons. Compassionate and intelligent design is an essential element of the human experience of place. Great spaces transcend location, design and physical constraints. They provide added social meaning and value and become catalysts for tourism and beacons for their neighborhoods and the cities in which they reside.

Sustainability

The marketplace and new building codes require that projects are environmentally sensitive. Visionary building owners and developers are embracing this move with enthusiasm. There will be a demonstrable payback to our environment in the long term, and in many cases hospitality guests are demanding and are willing to pay extra for sustainable design, affording some payback in the short term as well. The proposed projects would be designed to meet whatever requirements that are identified by the developer/operator or of the identified funding source for the construction loan.

COMPLETE PROJECT METHODOLOGY

This methodology involves the planning and design of the proposed food hall conversion. A master plan is created first to allow for the establishment and orderly development of the proposed restaurants, bar, vendors and accessory spaces. The plan shall incorporate the review of all functions to be located on the site and to determine the present and future needs of each function. The plan shall be structured in a fashion that will ensure the preservation and character of the developer’s vision for the mall. The end result will be a master plan that is cost effective and fully integrated with the building and neighborhood.

In order to accomplish this task, the existing development plans, documents and previously completed studies will be reviewed and all applicable conditions analyzed. The project will be evaluated with respect to specific functional and code requirements and the extent of new building improvements required. Careful attention will be given to major components with special code or system requirements.

Upon completion and approval of the master plan, the design phases are commenced and the construction documentation for the proposed project is developed. The specific approach will vary in response to the unique requirements of individual projects but will follow a paradigm that we have developed based on our experience with commercial construction. The methodology will ensure that all work will satisfy the programmatic requirements of the project while providing an efficient and cost effective design that is fully integrated with the site and neighborhood.

The following is an outline of procedural steps for the designed implementation of a typical master plan. A more complete project methodology is provided elsewhere in this proposal.

  • Meet with appropriate personnel to define the scope of the project and identify relevant sources of information. Review of Owner’s development and business plans.
  • Review available documentation including previously completed reports, previous design concepts and adjacent buildings.
  • Evaluate the proposed site with respect to current existing conditions. Review of pertinent information including property surveys and other available documentation.
  • Evaluate the project's relationship, integration and impact within the environment of the site.
  • Review applicable zoning ordinance and other City requirements. Review and outline major codes and standards that govern or apply to the project. Develop diagrams and formulas that will become major determinants of options for configurations of construction.
  • Interview the project Developer/Owner to obtain evaluations of the proposed development alternatives.
  • Develop schematic design solutions incorporating all of the conclusions determined in the analysis phases and the facility program, followed by interpretive meetings with the appropriate representatives leading to the development of the final design solutions.
  • Preparation of summaries of all proposed new work and determination of a construction cost estimate.
  • Preparation of reports and master plan for presentation to the Owner as required for discussion and comment.

PROJECT METHODOLOGY

The following will describe the scope of work we will perform based upon our understanding of this commercial project:p>

Part 1: PROJECT PLANNING (Phases A-C)

PHASE A: PROGRAM ANALYSIS

The purpose of this phase is to evaluate the proposed project in terms of physical, economic and functional feasibility. The analysis will evaluate the design objectives, limitations and criteria of the project as set forth by the Owner.

This phase will specifically address the following:

  • Analyze the existing architectural drawings for the building. Review of space requirements including reception, lobby, food service facilities and back-of-house operations.
  • The identification of special equipment and systems required.
PHASE B: NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS

The purpose of this phase is to analyze the proposed site in terms of its size, neighborhood relationships and physical limitations. This evaluation will provide information that will shape the physical development of the project.

This phase will specifically address the following:

  • Analysis of site related data including building surveys.
  • Location of available utilities to the site.
  • Physical investigations of the site and adjacent neighborhood structures.
PHASE C: MASTER PLANNING

In this phase the general scope, scale, and relationship of project components will be further developed from the concept drawings. The project will be described with sketches and other documents and methods as required. The work in this phase establishes the revised schematic design from which the final design can be developed.

This phase will specifically address the following:

  • Meetings to determine design intention and direction with respect to design intent and architecture.
  • Develop refined conceptual plans utilizing the information collected in the Program Analysis Phase to include floor plan utilization studies. These drawings will describe the character of the project in terms of size, organization and height.
  • Informal meeting with project team and presentation to City officials as may be required.
PHASE D: SCHEMATIC DESIGN

In this phase the general scope, scale, and relationship of project components will be developed utilizing the parameters established by the programming study and the master plan. The project will be described with drawings and other documents and methods as required. The work in this phase establishes the schematic design from which the final design is developed.

This phase will specifically address the following:

  • Develop interior master plan diagrams utilizing the information provided or determined.
  • Develop conceptual building plans describing the basic character, spatial organizations and relationships within the proposed project.
  • Preliminary drawings that describe the character of the project in terms of size and configuration and the use of materials on the exterior and interior of the buildings.
  • Presentation to the appropriate City officials if necessary to confirm compliance.
PHASE E: DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

The purpose of this phase is to develop the final design of the project from information determined in the previous phases.

This phase will specifically address the following:

  • Final design scheme will be determined for the project from the design developed in the last phase including floor plans and exterior building elevations, if required by the scope of the project.
  • Final determination and selection of architectural systems and materials. Coordinate Owner’s engineering team including architectural and mechanical engineers as required by the project and specific requirements.
  • Final confirmation of building materials and finishes.
PHASE F: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE

In this phase, construction documents consisting of drawings and specifications will be prepared. These documents are prepared according to the final project development determined in the previous phase.

This phase will specifically address the following:

  • Preparation of drawings and written specifications setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the project including all required architectural systems, exterior modifications including the new lobby entrance, retail storefronts, new windows, shop drawing review for code compliance and other required information and documentation.
  • Assistance to the Owner in connection with the filing of documents required for the approval of all City authorities having jurisdiction.
PHASE G: CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION

The work performed in this phase is to carry out the administration of the construction contract as a representative of the Owner and to advise and consult with the Owner. The work will be performed over time as required on a time and expense basis. Careful management in this phase by all parties will be critical to the success of this particular project.

This phase will specifically address the following:

  • Assist in the communication of instructions between Owner and General Contractor.
  • Meetings as required and site visits at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction to become generally familiar with the progress of the work.
  • Applications for payment by the General Contractor will be coordinated and managed.
  • Review of General Contractors' submittals including shop drawings, product data and samples, change orders, etc.

PROFESSIONAL FEES

The fee arrangement for this project will be proposed as a flat fee. The proposed fee for this project will be presented in three parts:

  1. Project Planning
  2. Schematic Design
  3. Project Execution

In order to prepare this proposal, assumptions have been made to determine pricing, costs and services required. These assumptions are listed below, however any changes to these assumptions may require adjustments to pricing.

  • This office assumes all plumbing services, design and metering (capacity and sizing of gas/water/sanitary services) will be completed by the developers and will be brought to the demised premises. The tenant will then pick up from said utility locations and pipe to final locations. We will provide load letter for services required.
  • This office assumes electrical services design and metering will be completed by the developer and will locate the service panels within the boundaries of the tenant space for tenant distribution to their final locations. We will provide load letters for power requirements
  • This office assumes all mechanical exhaust systems can penetrate the ceiling/roof above the tenants or the developer will provide base building fresh air and exhaust systems to tap into.
  • This office assumes the developer’s architects will be responsible for the exterior storefront design and the tenant’s architects will be able to coordinate with developer architect on final locations of doors within the storefront in order to provide access to the food hall space.
    Part 1: Conceptual Project Planning
  • Phase A: Program and Project Analysis
    Phase B: Site Analysis
    Phase C: Master Planning

This fee would include the master planning of the food hall. The majority of work in this phase will focus on the measurement and documentation of extant building scheduled for use, the development of layout alternatives, floor plans, and exterior images understanding that this is the critical component of a master plan discussion.

    Part 2: Schematic Design
  • Phase D: Schematic Design
    Structural Engineering Consulting Fee
    Mechanical Engineering Consulting Fee

This fee would include the full design of the building concepts significantly developed to ensure that the resultant design is intelligently planned and incorporates cost effective mechanical and structural systems. We are advocating significant design input from our US based structural engineer and mechanical engineer in order to optimize systems for efficiency and to define structural system and mechanical system parameters. This is very important during the planning stages. The fee also includes preparation meetings with the project team.

Part 3: Project Execution

Professional fees for execution of the final design and construction document phases, including the interior design, shall be determined as a flat rate fee based on a percentage of construction reflecting the complexity of the project developed in the Part 2.

Total for Parts 1, 2 & 3: $1,375,000

Services and items not included in the proposal number above, however, can be budgeted as separate line items:

  • Restaurant Equipment specialist (Jacobs Doland Beer): $ TBD
  • Misc. Structural work: $ 75,000.00
  • Construction Administration: $ 375,000.00
Schedule

All dates assume an award and start of work by Architectura by Spring of 2020, to meet project completion date of August 2022.

  • Part 1: Conceptual Project Planning
    Phase A: Program and Project Analysis April 2020 - June 2020
    Phase B: Site Analysis
    Phase C: Master Planning
  • Part 2: Schematic Design
    Phase D: Schematic Design July 2020 – October 2020
    Phase E: Design Development November 2020 – March 2021
    Phase F: Construction Documents April 2021 – November 2021
    Phase G: Bidding and Negotiation November 2021 – February 2021

Accommodation of Governmental Bodies

It is recognized by Owner and Architect that the above schedule may be affected by the timing and actions of the various City oversight agencies empowered to review and approve the project.

This proposal does not cover any time or cost required for acquiring of variances, zoning or city plan changes or other public or agency hearings other than acquiring a building permit.

Other Professional Consultants

Other professional consultants that will or may be required to be retained by the Owner for the approval process may include a surveyor, site/civil engineer, landscape architect and traffic engineer. After approval, the Owner will require additional consultants including geotechnical engineer, environmental engineer and acoustical engineer. Owner will retain a mechanical engineer and a structural engineer as part of basic services.

Respectfully Submitted,
Conrad J Roncati, RA
Chief Executive Officer

Architectura, Inc.
Suite LL100
One Executive Drive
Fort Lee, New Jersey USA
201-346-1400